Revolut Tricked by Fake Government Email Requests

Infosecurity Magazine · High sophistication
Last updated September 14, 2026

Revolut confirmed a breach after an attacker impersonated a government agency and sent fraudulent data requests from what appeared to be a legitimate government email domain. Employees processed the requests as normal legal-compliance work, leading to exposure of sensitive customer identity and account information for a limited number of customers.

Key findings

  • An unauthorized third party submitted “fraudulent requests for information” using a “legitimate government agency domain email.”
  • Revolut called it “a sophisticated external impersonation scam” and said the requests had “valid technical domain authentication.”
  • Revolut employees fulfilled the requests as standard legal compliance, resulting in disclosure of sensitive customer data.
  • Reportedly exposed data included PII (name, DOB, address, phone, email, occupation) plus identity documents and selfies; a researcher also alleged exposure of financial details (IBANs, transaction/withdrawal history, Bitcoin wallet reference numbers).
  • Revolut said systems and customer funds were not affected and it blocked the address, notified customers, and alerted authorities and regulators.

Who’s being targeted

  • Commonly targeted roles: Legal, Compliance, Privacy/Data Protection, Customer Support/Operations, Fraud/Investigations, Security Awareness (customer communications).
  • Affected industries: Financial services / fintech.
  • Attack channels: email.
  • Impersonated: Government agency (using a legitimate government agency email domain).

Awareness takeaways

  • Treat emailed ‘government/legal’ data requests as high-risk and independently verify the requester through known, official channels before sharing any customer data.
  • Train teams that handle sensitive data (legal/compliance/privacy/operations) that a real-looking sender domain is not enough, attackers can impersonate trusted entities convincingly.
  • Warn customers to expect follow-on scams after a breach and to avoid sharing passcodes or one-time security codes with anyone contacting them unexpectedly.

Red flags to watch for

  • Request comes via email and asks for unusually broad/sensitive records
  • Relies on the sender domain appearing legitimate rather than independent verification
  • Process pressure: treated as “standard legal compliance” without stronger validation
Try Mirage

Mirage safely runs attacks like this one against your own team, so you find out what happens before a real adversary does.

Get a demo
Read the video transcript

Imagine this lands in your inbox: “Request for information, legal compliance. Please provide the requested customer records.” And it’s from a real government email domain. That’s exactly how Revolut was tricked. An unauthorized third party used a legitimate government agency domain with valid technical authentication, so the emails passed all the usual checks and were treated as standard legal work. Employees fulfilled the requests and sent over names, addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers, emails, ID documents, even transaction history. All because the sender domain looked right and the process felt routine. Your move: if an email claims to be a government or legal data request, stop. Don’t reply. Independently verify it using a phone number or portal you already trust before sending a single record.

Similar attacks

Revolut Smishing Uses Fake Identity Check

Revolut Smishing Uses Fake Identity Check

Following a Revolut data breach, scammers sent text messages that appeared to come from the same message thread as legitimate Revolut texts. The texts pushed victims to click a link for a fake identity “liveness check,” request camera access, and then capture passwords, information that could be…

September 21, 2026
Revolut Fooled by Govt Impersonation Email

Revolut Fooled by Govt Impersonation Email

A person posing as a government agency used an email address on that agency’s real domain to obtain sensitive customer records from Revolut. The same weekly roundup also describes a fake antivirus renewal web page impersonating Avast, telling victims their subscription renewed for €129.99 and…

September 20, 2026
Revolut Tricked by Spoofed Government Email

Revolut Tricked by Spoofed Government Email

Revolut confirmed a customer data breach after attackers used a compromised government agency domain to submit fake “official” requests for customer information. Revolut provided sensitive details (including IDs like passports and driver’s licenses) based on those email requests, raising questions…

September 18, 2026
Revolut Tricked by Stolen Govt Email

Revolut Tricked by Stolen Govt Email

Attackers used a compromised government email account to pose as authorities and request customer records from Revolut. Employees believed the requests were legitimate and voluntarily sent sensitive customer information, exposing data for nearly 700 people. The incident highlights how “trusted”…

September 18, 2026
Revolut Users Hit With SMS Phish After Breach

Revolut Users Hit With SMS Phish After Breach

Days after Revolut disclosed that customer records were shared with an unauthorized party, some customers reported receiving phishing texts that appeared in the same SMS thread as real Revolut messages. The link led to a fake site that asked for camera access to mimic Revolut’s identity “liveness”…

September 17, 2026
ChatGPT Billing Phish and Fake Snap Support Scams

ChatGPT Billing Phish and Fake Snap Support Scams

This roundup describes real-world social engineering, including phishing emails that impersonate ChatGPT billing to steal payment card data and a convicted attacker who posed as Snapchat support to trick people into handing over login codes. The common theme is impersonation of trusted brands to…

July 31, 2026